You started your firm because you love architecture or engineering.
You're passionate about creating spaces and solving complex technical challenges.
As your firm grows, you find yourself spending more time in spreadsheets than in design software or connecting with potential clients.
Feeling Trapped by Your Own Success?
Revenue Feast or Famine:
You can't forecast cash flow because project billing is unpredictable
Growth Paralysis:
You want to hire more staff but aren't sure if you can afford them
Client Relationship Neglect:
You're too busy tracking project finances to nurture key relationships
Missed Opportunities:
You turn down projects because you can't assess financial feasibility quickly
The Hidden Costs.
What This Really Costs You:
Lost Revenue: Every hour you spend on finances is an hour not spent on business development
Stunted Growth: Without proper financial planning, you can't make confident growth decisions
Stress and Burnout: Financial uncertainty creates constant background anxiety
Team Impact: Your team needs your leadership on creative projects, not financial management
The A/E Specific Challenges.
Where Generic Financial Help Falls Short:
Project-Based Billing Complexity: Unlike recurring revenue businesses, A/E firms deal with retainer draws, milestone billing, and payment timing that varies by project and client type.
Professional Services Risk Management: A/E firms face unique liability exposures that require specialized insurance and contract expertise that most financial professionals don't understand.
Creative Process Integration: Financial planning must account for the reality of design iteration, client changes, and the unpredictable nature of creative problem-solving.
The Solution.
What Changes When You Have the Right CFO:
Time Freedom: Get back 10-15 hours per week to focus on what you do best
Confident Decision Making: Make growth decisions based on solid financial data
Predictable Cash Flow: Understand your financial position 3-6 months in advance
Strategic Growth: Scale systematically instead of reactively